Dropping a well-known company name from a product or marketing activity might seem counterintuitive, but some businesses are doing just that – employing a debranding strategy to make their companies appear less corporate and more forward-thinking.
Starbucks is experimenting with this strategy in an attempt to position itself as a friendly local coffee shop. Its ‘Starbucks’ moniker was removed from coffee cups in the UK last year, leaving only the siren symbol. And last month, its staff started asking customers their names, so they could write them on its takeaway cups, to make its service seem more personal and less corporate. ‘We’re Starbucks. Nice to meet you’ is the line used in the TV advertising that explains this decision.
While some customers might wonder why the chain needs to be on first name terms with them, the marketing strategy has certainly attracted attention. At its launch, Starbucks gave away free lattés for one day, resulting in its highest ever buzz and attention scores, according to YouGov’s BrandIndex, which measures response to brands via its online panel.
But this is not the chain’s first attempt to rid itself of its distinctive corporate branding.
Nobody calls the Mini the BMW Mini even though it belongs to BMW. So why would we call ourselves RBS Coutts?
In the US, the business has experimented with stores called ‘15th Ave Coffee & Tea’, with ‘Inspired by Starbucks’ on them, to provide a more independent coffee shop feel. The chain has also just launched its first Evolution Fresh juice store in the US, where references to the corporate name are entirely absent.
In the UK, Starbucks’ debranding strategy means that no two shops are the same. The chain says that its recently opened cafés in London and Edinburgh are designed to fit into the local environment rather than shouting out its corporate heritage.
Meliá Hotels International vice-president of marketing Tony Cortizas, says one of the first brands to use this strategy was Nike, which has moved away from using its name, preferring just the ‘swoosh’ logo. He adds that Starbucks faces similar issues to the sports brand.
“There is an issue of maturity with a brand. Starbucks’ problem, which is the same that Nike has faced, is that it is everywhere. The saturation of the brand has reached the point where people are [seeing] a Starbucks on every corner. You reach a point where your logo is no longer cool.”
While this isn’t a strategy that Meliá is currently using – in the UK it is working on reinforcing its brand with the launch of high-end boutique hotel ME London this June – Cortizas can see the benefits of a debranding strategy.
This debranding strategy is an emerging trend that sectors as diverse as finance and fashion are employing to make their brands more desirable.
The private bank Coutts has recently removed RBS from its international logo, following the financial turmoil dogging its parent company. Ian Ewart, global head of products, services and marketing, claims that by removing RBS it is helping to simplify the branding in the UK and internationally (see Coutts, below).
Other brand owners are taking the debrand concept further and having no reference to the parent brand on products, as in the case for most of Tesco’s venture brands. Its Chokablok ice cream, Lathams pet food and its latest launch, Llama’s snacks, show no link with the retailer other than to state in advertising that they are available at Tesco.
Brand development director Sidonie Kingsmill says the retailer carries out research as to whether its name should feature on own-label goods or not (see Q&A, below).
“We consistently do research where we check whether products are better with the Tesco name on or off. Almost without fail it is better for Tesco to be on it because customers get it. They see it as more reliable, they know it is good value and where it is coming from.”
She adds that whether the Tesco name appears on its venture brands also has no hard and fast rules, pointing out that its Naturally Powered cleaning products do bear its branding. She says: “It depends on what is right for that particular product.”
Having these venture brands that are developed by the retailer and exclusively available in its stores helps to encourage shoppers into Tesco. The products can be offered at lower prices than other branded goods because little money is spent marketing them, claims Kingsmill. However, she doesn’t feel that they are necessarily debranded products, being strong brands in themselves.
The US store JCPenney is another brand that has developed separate ranges that do not use its name, including The Original Jean Company and Xersion. After posting an operating loss of $171m (£107m) in the third quarter of 2011, the business is restructuring and is using a debranding strategy to help push forward its private label brands.
JCPenney declined to comment, but a statement from the company says that newly appointed senior vice-president of strategic brands Bill Gentner will be “responsible for reinvigorating JCPenney’s portfolio of high-performing private brands, including ensuring brand integrity in how they are merchandised, marketed and presented in the company’s private brand in-store shops.”
The revamp comes in the wake of the end of a deal with Ralph Lauren, which produced garments exclusively for retailer JCPenney which were marketed under the American Living label – no use was made of the Ralph Lauren branding.
Senior vice-president of advertising, marketing and corporate communications David Lauren has previously explained the strategy to Marketing Week. He said:
“We have started brands from scratch like American Living which do not say Ralph Lauren and they reach a totally different customer.
“No, they do not know [that Ralph Lauren makes American Living clothes] and it does not matter, it is just us reaching a customer who is looking for less expensive products and in a store where we would not sell Ralph Lauren products.”
Other luxury brands are experimenting with whether their logos should feature on products or not. Gucci is working on finding a balance here, to make sure that it reaches ‘the more sophisticated end of the market’, presumably in response to its logo being flashed on handbags by those in the public eye deemed ‘unsophisticated’. Parent company PPR says: “This new strategy is not simply based on finding a new balance between logo and
no-logo products, but also on defining the appropriate mix of fabric, leather and precious materials.
“The success of this means that today the brand has achieved an enhanced positioning and exclusivity, recapturing the more knowledgeable clients as it continues to attract aspirational customers, especially from the newer markets, with an increasingly higher average price-point.”
Indeed, Gucci says it is moving towards an emphasis on logo-free leather products, contributing to a 25% increase in annual profit to nearly €1bn (£837m), as reported in February.
Other brands are using debranding in their advertising to appeal to specific audiences. Unilever’s VO5 Extreme Style hair products were advertised last year in an unbranded ‘teaser’ TV spot, later followed by a branded commercial in the same style. It featured the ‘Pliktisijiteur Pageant,’ a show in a fictional village and set early in the 20th century.
Brand manager Richard Whitty says the focus of the campaign was engaging content rather than pushy branded ads. “It was all about the story, it was about a village and its talent show and pageant. The more focused you can keep it to telling a story rather than pushing a product, the more sharable it is.”
Targeted at 16- to 24-year-olds, the aim was to get the video to go viral. “Giving them something unbranded adds to the product’s credibility. This is about building brand equity, it is not just about pushing products and saying ‘how many extra pots of fibre putty can we sell on the back of this?’”
Indeed the teaser has now been viewed 130,000 times on YouTube, and the following branded advertisement 214,000 times. The full 90-second version will run in cinemas later this year.
Whitty says this strategy helps to differentiate VO5 from the other brands he also manages, including the recently launched Lynx hair products and Brylcreem. He explains: “We have been watching closely how sales have been affected since the advertising went live. We have spent a long time pulling apart those two brands [Lynx and VO5] and very much see a Lynx user as entry-level, whereas we see VO5 users as more confident and experimental.
“We’ll be watching how sales of VO5 are affected by the Lynx launch, but our feeling is that the two attract different customers.”
As businesses continue to experiment throughout 2012 with a debranding strategy, it appears that just churning out goods and marketing activity bearing famous brand names is no longer a winning strategy.
All for now,
Pat Rigney Managing Director Fastnet Brands
My full time passion is my full time business which is building, creating, refreshing and reinventing brands at Fastnet.
We aim to excite consumers, engage the trade and add value to your business.
We bring our International experience and network to bear on supporting your business, grow. We strive to improve and deliver exponential shareholder value.
Patrick Rigney Managing Director Fastnet Brands
